Although living within a biofilm contains significant advantages (protection, good living conditions, etc) there are also times when the bacteria will want to swim away, in order to disperse and form new colonies. The bacteria C. crescentus has an interesting way of doing this, each round of cell division produces two cells: a moving 'swarmer' cell and a non-motile 'stalked' cell which attaches to the biofilm, or any other surface. If conditions are right, the swarmer cells swarmer cells will eventually turn into stalked cells; loosing their flagellum (which are used to swim), retracting their pili, and growing a membranous 'stalk' to attach it to surfaces or surrounding bacteria. This is shown below:
Lifecycle of Caulobacter crescentus - image from reference 1
Exactly what it was that turned the motile cells into stable ones and maintained the biofilm was not well understood. Recent research found, rather excitingly, that one factor that could lead to the maintenance of swarmer cells, and the breaking up of biofilms, was extracellular DNA (eDNA) - i.e genetic material that had escaped from cells and was floating around the biofilm. Adding eDNA to C. crescentus biofilms lead to biofilm dispersal, an affect that was reversed by adding DNase enzymes that broke down the DNA.
Why is eDNA such an important signal? Because it's one of the most common products produced from dying cells within a biofilm. Once bacteria in a biofilm die, their cellular integrity breaks down, their insides become their outsides and their genetic material spills out into the surrounding area. This can then act as a powerful signal for surrounding cells, and if the cells around you are dying then where you currently are is clearly not a good place to be. This is also useful when areas of biofilm start to get saturated with too many bacteria, just a few dying off will clear the way for new swarmers to leave and maybe set up colonies elsewhere.
---
Berne C, Kysela DT, & Brun YV (2010). A bacterial extracellular DNA inhibits settling of motile progeny cells within a biofilm. Molecular microbiology PMID: 20598083
Jermy A (2010). eDNA limits biofilm attachment. Nature reviews. Microbiology, 8 (9) PMID: 20737663
---
Follow me on Twitter!
4 comments:
I live in Chicago and spread throughout the city are light poles with flashing blue lights at the top. These signal 'high crime areas' and therefore, stay away! eDNA are the bacteria's flashing blue lights, very cool.
One question, have Berne or Jermy and company figured out if its specific DNA sequences that the bacteria recognize or just the presence of any nucleic acids?
Did you see the stuff on "BacillaFilla?" Using quorum sensing to our advantage. I haven't found any scholarly papers on it (I didn't look very hard), but it looks sweet.
@Tom: Thanks for the comment! So far it just seems to be random DNA sequences that signal the breakup - it's not certain exactly *how* this acts as a signal either.
@Kevin: I took a quick look at the BacillaFilla stuff, looks interesting! It was an iGEM project as well, so I think I caught bits of it on twitter etc.
@Tom
Definitely just random sequences. there was a study, wish I could find it, where they tested eDNA sequence frequencies against fragmented chromosomal sequences from Pseudomonas and could find no difference.
Post a Comment